Dr. Kristin Latham-Scott

Western Oregon University

Research

Background Current Projects

Undergraduate Researchers:

Grace Knapp: 2018-present

Eva Batenhorst*: 2018-present

Sydney Thomas: 2019

Nick Wanderscheid*#^: 2017-2019

Faye (Beth) Gagnon*: 2016-2018

Maria Franco Ramos*: 2016-2018

Tori Crumrine*: 2016-present

Rachel Mendazona*: 2015-2017

Mariah McKechnie^*: 2015-2017

Sarah Thompson*%: 2015-2016

Connor Osterberg*%: 2015-2016

Natalie Wallace*~%: 2014-2016

Stephanie Torres*^%: 2014-2016

Aaron Romero*: 2013 - 2015

Taylor James*^#: 2013-2015

Eli Zachary*^~#: 2013-2015

Max Kohen*: 2014

Spicie Davis*^#: 2013-2014

Adam Pettitt*: 2013- 2014, 2011 - 2012

Ryan Parker*: 2012 - 2013

Trevor Roush*: 2012 - 2013

Elizabeth Mason*: 2012 - 2013

Jenna Schneider*: 2011 - 2012

Amy Nicholson*: 2011 - 2012

Brandon Walker*: 2011

James Kramer: 2010-2011

Amanda LaKamp: 2009

*Poster, Academic Excellence Showcase

%Oral talk, Academic Excellence Showcase

^Poster presentation at a regional or national meeting

~Researched used for Honor's Thesis project

#Walker Scholarship recipient

Drosophila melanogaster

Drosophila toxic response to
P. fluorescens

I use Drosophila melanogaster for the study of host-microbe interactions and host immune response. After ingestion of Pseudomonas fluorescens strains, Drosophila melanogaster larvae exhibit delayed development, morphological defects, and often die.  Interestingly, these responses in Drosophila are dependent on the concentration and strain of P. fluorescens used. Pseudomonads are known to be opportunistic pathogens of other species, including humans, thus a model study in Drosophila is widely applicable.

P. fluorescens is a soil-dwelling, gram-negative bacterium, part of a larger group of Pseudomonads. Genes predicted to function in insect toxicity have been found in P. fluorescens, genomes of P. fluorescens strains have been sequenced, and metabolites have begun to be catalogued, allowing experiments to tease apart which strains, and specifically which metabolites, are responsible for the toxic responses in Drosophila.

Drosophila are exposed to a variety of bacteria and fungi in their native environment, many of which are not toxic.  When larvae or adults encounter pathogenic microbes, three different innate immunity pathways respond. There are seven different antimicrobial peptides downstream of these pathways that are activated in response to gram-negative bacteria, such as P. fluorescens. This opens the possibility that Drosophila mutants could be screened for their toxicity phenotype in response to P. fluorescens ingestion.

The purpose of my research is to deduce which P. fluorescens metabolites are involved in Drosophila immune response, and what molecular pathways within Drosophila mediate this response.

Drosophila molecular components involved in innate immunity are highly conserved across species.  For example, Toll receptors in Drosophila are homologous to human cytokine receptors IL-1 and IL-18 that stimulate innate immune defenses.  Assay of bacterial triggers and immune response in Drosophila will help elucidate the relationship between pathogens and immune response in several species, including humans.

Directional preference in Drosophila melanogaster*

Drosophila melanogaster is an organism that is commonly analyzed and used to understand basic behavioral and genetic mechanisms. We are examining whether there is a basis for directional preferences in flies and whether this has genetic underpinnings via a directional choice maze set to north versus south, where each fly makes 10 choices of whether to go north or south. Of flies that exit the maze, we select the top 20% and bottom 20% to give rise to the next generation.  Successive generations are run through the maze for 15 generations. Analysis of the data will show whether flies have a selective preference over successive generations, indicating a genetic basis for directional preference. We are using positive phototaxis experiments in our Y-maze as a control. These findings could lead to a better understanding of the potential genetics of magnetic orientation and directional preference in flies, which has been documented in other organisms.

*Research in conjunction with Dr. Mike Baltzley

Favorite Links

Flybase

Fly Exploratorium

Flies for Teachers

Fly Stocks

How to Get Into Grad School

fly pic


Drosophila melanogaster

You may have had this experience: sitting down while eating, minding your own business, you realize that you are under attack from small, very determined, very persistent flies. The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, also known as the vinegar fly, is a beloved organism for genetic and molecular studies (although highly annoying if you have encounted the situation described above).

The name Drosophila melanogaster means "black-bellied lover of dew" in Greek. Drosophila have been used in countless scientific studies, beginning in the early 1900s when Thomas Hunt Morgan claimed the fly as his research organism. Although Morgan originally worked to disprove genetic hypotheses developed by Gregor Mendel, Morgan is now honored as the father of classical Drosophila genetics (in the end, Morgan's research supported Mendelian genetic principles beautifully).

Drosophila continue to be widely used as a research organism for the following reasons: (1) they are cheap, (2) they have a short life-cycle of approximately 10 days from egg to fertile adult, (3) they are amazingly fecund; one female can lay around 500 eggs (4) people aren't generally bothered if you bump off hundreds of flies at a time, (5) their genetics are well-documented, they have only four chromosomes, and databases of genetic information are easliy available, (6) they are more like us than you might think! As it turns out, roughly 60% of human disease genes have counterparts in Drosophila.


And because I am always asked...

How to get rid of fruit flies:

It's true, fruit flies are very pesky, especially if you are not enjoying them for their research qualities. The reason flies hang around is because you have something they want - old fruit laying out, recycling with beer/soda residue, drips between the garbage can and the liner - the trick is to find and remove whatever is attracting the flies. That is the sure-fire method.

If that fails, below are instructions for trapping and removing fruit flies.

1. Take an empty 2-liter bottle and cut around the plastic to remove the top section, about three inches below the neck.

2. Place something delicious to flies in the bottom of the bottle (options include apple cider vinegar, a bit of leftover beer, mushed up fruit).

3. Invert the top part of the bottle that you removed and place it inside the bottom portion of the bottle such that it creates a funnel to the delicious morsel/fly attractant.

4. Seal the top and bottom portions of the bottle together - I recommend duct tape, but whatever works.

5. Flies will be attracted into the bottle via the funnel opening, but will have a hard time figuring out how to escape. When you feel that your capture is complete, seal the bottle opening and dispose of the bottle. You can always make another one.

 

 

Latham-Scott Homepage / WOU Homepage