Patrie 5.3
"Big Grandma"

 

Study Questions

Describe the context and participants for this interpretation.

David Burnight is telling a story about his "big" Grandmother to a first grade class. There are two deaf students in the class (brother and sister) and the rest of the class is hearing.

1. Did you recall the message in each idea unit as a series of words or did you remember the meaning of the sentence?

For the most part I remembered each idea as a whole, but I still tried to keep the words/form in tact.

2. Did you remember the information based on prior experieces with a grandparent or older woman you know? How did your memories affect how you remembered and interpreted this passage? For example, what did the woman that you envisioned look like? What was she wearing? Where was she sitting or standing? What did her hair look like?

I have never heard of an elderly person enjoying hikes, or going camping. I feel l this helped my interpretation because I created a new, very specific schema for what was happening. The older woman I saw looked somewhat like my Grandma Paul, but taller and sturdier. I envisioned her leading the way.

3. How stressful was it to remember this passage? Circle the answer that most closely describes your reaction and say why. Did your interpretation show your level of stress?

Not very stressful; the moment I realized my channel was filling up with minor details I felt a little stressed, but I do not feel that showed in the rest of my interpretation.

4. Did irrelevant stimuli distract you and interfere with storage and recall of information? If so describe the distractions. Briefly describe how working with a longer passage affected your ability to remember the meaning.

Yes-my two cats were going in and out of the room, messing with my black recording curtain and playing with my feet. As for the length, no this did not bother me as much. Because I have been doing my simultaneous activities, the length did not affect me as much; however, if I would not have been able to take notes I know I would have been more stressed.

5. Compare your interpretation with the source message. Does the interpretation preserve the message? Compare each idea unit in the source message and compare it with the idea units in the interpretation. Are they equivalent? Are those ideas presented in the same order as the original? If not, why not? If not, does the change of order affect the meaning?

For the most part I feel that the message is the same; however, in some places where I could not find the correct translation into asl, the meaning/ideas are a little off.

 

5 Step Follow-Up

List at least one positive aspect of your interpretation.

I liked some of my classifier choices.

*Note: I did not focus on this, but I still wanted to point out a positive aspect in my work.


Step 1: Interpretation Rendered
Transcribe the portions of the interpretation you would like to improve.

SOME MY FAVORITE THINK MEMORY HERS.

I CALL BIG GRANDMA BECAUSE I HAVE SHORT GRANDMA TOO

BIG GRANDMA NOT FAT/CHUBBY JUST TALL (mouthed "big")

LIVE 1/2 TIME MY FAMILY OTHER 1/2 MY UNCLE, HER SON

Step 2: Revisions
Write a revised interpretation for each error identified in Step 1 that better preserves the meaning of the original source.

Original: SOME MY FAVORITE THINK MEMORY HERS.
Revised: FEW MY FAVORITE MEMORY O-F HER.
Literal translation
4 = Minimal

Original: I CALL BIG GRANDMA BECAUSE I HAVE SHORT GRANDMA TOO.
Revised: I CALL B-I-G GRANDMA WHY (rh-q) BECAUSE I HAVE " " S-M-A-L-L GRANDMA TOO.
Inadequate source language proficiency
3 = Moderate

Original: BIG GRANDMA NOT FAT/CHUBBY JUST TALL (mouthed "big").
Revised: B-I-G GRANDMA NOT FAT JUST B-I-G.
Inadequate source language proficiency
3 = Moderate

Original: LIVE 1/2 TIME MY FAMILY OTHER 1/2 MY UNCLE, HER SON.
Revised: LIVE 1/2 TIME MY FAMILY, OTHER 1/2 HER SON HIS FAMILY.
Addition
5 = None


Step 3: Determine Error Types
Choose one of the five types of reasons for your errors.

  1. Literal translation
  2. Inadequate language proficiency (source language or target language)
  3. Omission
  4. Addition
  5. Nonconservation of paralinguistic elements

Step 4: Effect of Error on Communicative Function
Decide the severity of each error.

 

5 = None
4 = Minimal
3 = Moderate
2 = Severe
1 = Grave

Step 5: Action Plan
Once you have determined the reason for error in the interpretating process and its impact on the communicative function, write down what action you plan to take to improve your work.

I plan on asking for advice on how to talk about "big" in different ways: big bones, big as in tall, etc. I also plan to interpret this passage a second time in the near future.

 

"Artists"


 

Homepage

Back

Progress Tracking Sheet