Name: Ashley Paul Draft: Final
Your work sample will be graded per the
following areas. Ratings of 1 to 6 are
below expectations for this course, ratings of 7 to 8 are satisfactory/good and
ratings of 9 and 10 are excellent/exceptional.
|
|
Understanding of
function and purpose of interpretation: |
Interpretation work clearly represents the goal of the speaker.
Interpreter consistently take accountability for his/her own work when
necessary/appropriate. |
.25
X 1
2 3 4
5 6 7
8 9 10 = _2_ /2.5 |
|
Meaning Based
Work: |
Main points and details conveyed, conveys implicit meaning when
necessary/appropriate, and frames culturally rich ideas when
necessary/appropriate. |
1.0 X
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
10 = _9_ /10 |
|
Interpreting
Process: |
Moves through lexical, phrasal, and sentential levels as
necessary. There is evidence of textual processing throughout the work. |
1.0 X
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
10 = _10_ /10 |
|
Target Language
Composition – English: |
|
.75 X
1
2 3 4
5 6 7
8 9 10 = _6.5_ /7.5 |
|
Quality of the
Interpretation: |
Interpretation provided for consumers in the interaction was
meaning based and consumer driven. Consumers would have been able to get
their business accomplished with little to no hindrance from the
interpretation. |
1.5 X
1
2 3 4
5 6 7
8 9 10 = _14_ /15 |
|
Demeanor and
Attire: |
Professional demeanor including posture, mannerisms, eye gaze
and non-verbal communication. Appropriate attire for the given situation
(contrasting, solid color as well as range of formality) |
.5 X
1
2 3 4
5 6 7
8 9 10 = _5_ /5 |
|
|
|
Final Grade: __47/50 ___ |
|
|
Comments: Cohesion could be worked on. I noticed that the interpretation did not
sound as natural as it could have, and I think in the future I will be able to
correct this in my interpretations.